{"id":426,"date":"2015-05-12T18:41:41","date_gmt":"2015-05-12T06:41:41","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/deborahfitchett.com\/blog\/?p=426"},"modified":"2015-05-12T18:41:41","modified_gmt":"2015-05-12T06:41:41","slug":"kiss-goodbye-to-roadblocks-in-scholarly-infrastructure-theta2015","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/deborahfitchett.com\/blog\/2015\/05\/kiss-goodbye-to-roadblocks-in-scholarly-infrastructure-theta2015\/","title":{"rendered":"KISS Goodbye to roadblocks in scholarly infrastructure #theta2015"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>KISS Goodbye to roadblocks in scholarly infrastructure<\/strong> (<a href=\"http:\/\/theta.edu.au\/program\/keynote-speakers\/programkeynote-speakerskeynote-speakers-2015-martin-fenner\/\">abstract<\/a>)<br \/>\nMartin Fenner, Technical Lead, Public Library of Science (PLOS) @mfenner<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Advanced search&#8221; screen vs simple Google-style search vs Wikipedia article about Crick and Watson article which also discusses Franklin controversy. Article itself is on Nature (doi:10.1038\/171737a0) and requires a login, payment, or rent. Nature eventually made it [this <em>vital historic article<\/em>!] freely available for 50th anniversary if you happen to know the right link&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>Another model: can get it for free but have to sign up first and insists on knowing your affiliation, job title, etc etc.  Cf logins that require only email address, nickname, password. [We really need a secure, universal, federated authentication system. I&#8217;m not sure whether or not this is an oxymoron, but we still need it.]<\/p>\n<p>For reuse: often have to say what for, what format, who you&#8217;re distributing to, etc and then pay ridiculous amounts of money to the publisher to just show a figure at a conference.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/plos.org\/open-access\/howopenisit\/>&#8216;HowOpenIsIt?\u00ae&#8217; Open Access Spectrum (OAS)&#8221;<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Citation problems &#8211; thousands of citation formats. Usually use a reference manager. Which introduces encoding issues. http:\/\/api.crossref.org\/works\/{doi} uses Citeproc JSON<\/p>\n<p><em>Agree on standards before it&#8217;s too late!<\/em> Cites <a href=\"http:\/\/xkcd.com\/927\">http:\/\/xkcd.com\/927<\/a> [Earlier discussed history of why we have so many plug\/socket standards &#8211; because window of opportunity to develop standards was around the 1930s and countries weren&#8217;t really talking to each other&#8230;]<\/p>\n<p>Persistent identifiers. Could argue you don&#8217;t need bibliographic info, just persistent id eg DOI, PMID, Bibcode ID. First problem is that there&#8217;s more than one. Second problem is that there&#8217;s also URLs associated with these. And then, CrossRef DOI display guidelines says always display as permanent URLs in online environment [cf the problem earlier this year when their DOI resolver went down whereas other resolvers kept working, and they said that we shouldn&#8217;t rely on a single server\/permanent URL]. [Plus and also, many DOIs aren&#8217;t as permanent as they were meant to be.]<\/p>\n<p>Different places refer to article with different identifiers &#8211; interoperability issues. [Does anyone map DOIs to PMIDs to Bibcodes to&#8230;?]<\/p>\n<p>Rise of the stacks: Elsevier; ResearchGate; Digital Science; Academia.edu all trying to merge publishing and social sites for publishers [some coming from one angle some from another]<\/p>\n<p>Cameron Neylon&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/cameronneylon.net\/blog\/principles-for-open-scholarly-infrastructures\/\">principles for open scholarly infrastructures<\/a>: cover governance (stakeholder governed, transparent), sustainability (&#8216;time-limited funds used only for time-limited activities&#8217; [this is such a good principle!], revenue based on services not data), insurance (open data, open source). ORCID has tried to <a href=\"http:\/\/orcid.org\/about\/what-is-orcid\/our-principles\">follow these principles<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Q: Given multiplicity of standards, how do we know ORCID is different.<br \/>\nA: ORCID is too young to say if it&#8217;s a success. Much thought went into it but of course always start out with best intentions.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>KISS Goodbye to roadblocks in scholarly infrastructure (abstract) Martin Fenner, Technical Lead, Public Library of Science (PLOS) @mfenner &#8220;Advanced search&#8221; screen vs simple Google-style search vs Wikipedia article about Crick and Watson article which also discusses Franklin controversy. Article itself is on Nature (doi:10.1038\/171737a0) and requires a login, payment, or rent. Nature eventually made it [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[263,262,261,246],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/deborahfitchett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/426"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/deborahfitchett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/deborahfitchett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/deborahfitchett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/deborahfitchett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=426"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/deborahfitchett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/426\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":427,"href":"https:\/\/deborahfitchett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/426\/revisions\/427"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/deborahfitchett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=426"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/deborahfitchett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=426"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/deborahfitchett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=426"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}