{"id":107,"date":"2011-08-09T11:17:00","date_gmt":"2011-08-08T23:17:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/deborahfitchett.com\/blog\/?p=107"},"modified":"2011-08-09T11:17:00","modified_gmt":"2011-08-08T23:17:00","slug":"on-the-humanities-and-the-innovation-adoption-curve","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/deborahfitchett.com\/blog\/2011\/08\/on-the-humanities-and-the-innovation-adoption-curve\/","title":{"rendered":"On the Humanities and the Innovation Adoption Curve"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;ve been catching up on my reading and am currently up to:<\/p>\n<p>Herrera, G. (2011). <a href=\"http:\/\/crl.acrl.org\/content\/72\/4\/372.short\">Google Scholar Users and User Behaviors: An Exploratory Study<\/a>. College &#038; Research Libraries, 72(4), 316-330.<\/p>\n<p>which looks at usage data about Google Scholar cunningly culled from link resolver logs.  There&#8217;s some really interesting stuff, but something they quote in their conclusion made my mind go off on a tangent:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\n<cite>On the other hand, the 2009 Ithaka faculty survey concluded that humanists &#8220;have been later and slower to change in many ways than their peers in the sciences, to be sure.&#8221;<\/cite> &#8211;Schonfeld and Housewright, &#8220;Faculty Survey 2009,&#8221; 34.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Which is an observation that comes up time and again, and often it&#8217;s implied that this is because the humanities are inherently conservative.  But is that really the case?  Correlation doesn&#8217;t mean causation.<\/p>\n<p>Could it instead be simply that new technologies <em>are designed by computer scientists for computer scientists<\/em>?  Engineering and physical sciences work similarly enough that they can adapt their usage pretty easily.  But the humanities &#8212; a few of us have been doing some mini sessions on scholarly ebooks for faculty, and what we&#8217;re hearing from faculty is that in the humanities they have completely different kinds of texts which need to be used in completely different kinds of ways, and <em>these ways are not supported by the technology<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>So I rather suspect that it&#8217;s rather less to do with the people than commonly implied, and rather more to do with systematic bias in the technology.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;ve been catching up on my reading and am currently up to: Herrera, G. (2011). Google Scholar Users and User Behaviors: An Exploratory Study. College &#038; Research Libraries, 72(4), 316-330. which looks at usage data about Google Scholar cunningly culled from link resolver logs. There&#8217;s some really interesting stuff, but something they quote in their [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[],"tags":[119,118,64,120],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/deborahfitchett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/107"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/deborahfitchett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/deborahfitchett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/deborahfitchett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/deborahfitchett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=107"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/deborahfitchett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/107\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/deborahfitchett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=107"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/deborahfitchett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=107"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/deborahfitchett.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=107"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}